What are the judges looking for?
Collaboration and vision
Successful applications will demonstrate:
- Working across disciplines, services, systems or organisations.
- Implementing research or quality improvement to address IPC challenges and improve patient safety.
- Sharing findings to improve knowledge and understanding among colleagues, patients and the public.
Measurable impact
Applications should provide evidence of improved outcomes, such as:
- Reduced healthcare-associated infections.
- Improved compliance with IPC practice.
- Increased knowledge and awareness.
- Improved patient and public safety.
- Better patient and staff experience.
Judges will also consider:
- Successful grant funding awards.
- Publication of research or quality improvement findings.
- Evidence that the work has informed IPC practice.
Innovation and improvement
Applicants should demonstrate:
- New approaches to addressing IPC challenges.
- Innovation in research or quality improvement methodology.
- Adaptability, resilience and flexibility in delivering projects to completion.
Influencing and inspiring others
Strong applications will show how the individual or team has:
- Demonstrated excellence in research and quality improvement practice.
- Shared findings to inform and improve IPC practice.
- Supported colleagues undertaking similar evidence-based work.
- Contributed to a culture of safety, learning and continuous improvement.
IPS values
Alongside the award-specific criteria, judges will consider how nominations reflect the values at the heart of IPS and our commitment to supporting the infection prevention community. This includes evidence of how nominees:
- Support and empower the workforce to deliver safe, high-quality care.
- Improve evidence-based IPC practice, surveillance and outcomes.
- Engage diverse communities and promote equitable access and inclusion.
- Create impact through leadership, education, collaboration and policy influence.